Women and “Bad Boys”

Posted By Savvy
Categorized Under: Relationships
Comments (0)

savvypic11 150x150 Women and Bad Boys

Troy Headrick
The American University in Cairo
Maadi, Cairo, Egypt
contact@savvy-women-magazine.com






Last week I blogged about why women have sex. This week I’m going to write about whom they choose to have sex with.

I found this CNN video that asks the age-old question: Why do women find “bad boys” so attractive? As you’ll see when you watch it, the three youngish women who appear early in the video are asked about Don Draper, the character in Mad Men, a new American TV drama series. Draper is supposed to represent the archetypical “Bad Boy,” and the three drool all over themselves as they talk about him. They refer to him as “mysterious,” “confident” and “magnetic.” One says (I’m paraphrasing) that he is the type you know you should avoid but can’t.

Don Draper2 Women and Bad Boys

  So I did a little follow-up Googling and found tons and tons of articles that claim   that women love such men and find them irresistible. What I didn’t find, though,   are serious research pieces that attempted to quantify this phenomenon. For   example, I didn’t find anything–it may be out there but I just didn’t see it–that talks   about the percentage of women who find these sorts attractive. Is it all women?   Some women? A majority? A few?

  Even Dr. Gail Saltz, the psychiatrist who appears in the video, keeps talking about   ”women” when she discusses this issue. By saying it this way, she gives the   impression that this is a universal attraction, that ALL women feel this way about   ”bad boys.”

  OK, I’m not a psychiatrist (nor do I play one on TV) but my gut tells me that some   women find these types of men attractive. Some don’t. Some prefer “good boys” in   the same way some women prefer blonds to brunettes.

My instinct tells that there’s something very harmful about thinking of women in such broad-brush, simplistic ways because if there’s one thing I can be certain about, it’s that all women everywhere, are complex.

I hope that doesn’t make me sound like a typical male chauvinist.

You’re Wearing THAT?

Posted By Savvy
Categorized Under: Relationships, Women's Issues
Comments (2)

savvypic11 150x150 Youre Wearing THAT?

Troy Headrick
The American University in Cairo
Maadi, Cairo, Egypt
contact@savvy-women-magazine.com







Just as a follow-up to last week’s Big Brother entry in which I briefly mentioned Deborah Tannen, linguist and author of numerous books on a variety of topics, including, most notably, the relationship between communication and psychology, I’ve decided to blog this twenty-nine minute interview between Tannen and a fawning Karen Allyn.

Though the subject of the interview is primarily Tannen’s bestselling book, You’re Wearing THAT?, it also ranges far afield and includes lots of very interesting disclosure about Tannen’s personal life, including her relationship with her own parents (especially her mother), and her other creative interests and accomplishments. So, if you’re a fan of Tannen and her work, this is a must-see.

I also discovered something about Tannen that I hadn’t known before: that she once taught writing classes to undergraduates, just as I do now.

Now, about the interview, there’s a lot there, and you may need to watch it more than once to get all the ideas and thus the full impact. Just in summary, You’re Wearing THAT? is a book that unravels the complex relationship between mothers and daughters, how that relationship grows through time as both mature, and the role that language plays in shaping the dynamic between the two.

Though there were many interesting moments in the interview, two things jumped out at me. Firstly, Tannen’s argument that mothers act as “lightning rods” in the family (you’ll have to watch the interview to see what she means by that!) is very true in my own experience. Secondly, she feels that we “all expect more of mothers than fathers and more of daughters than sons” and that this expectation shapes behavior and guilt patterns in families. I’ll need to spend a bit more time thinking about this contention and what it implies about daughters and sons, mothers and fathers.

The video concludes with the two discussing Tannen’s next project (just released, under the title You Were Always Mom’s Favorite!)–a book about sisters–a relationship that Tannen describes as one that’s “extremely close, but it’s extremely competitive and hierarchical” just as is the relationship between mothers and daughters.

Big Sister 11

Posted By Savvy
Categorized Under: Relationships
Comments (0)

savvypic11 150x150 Big Sister 11

Troy Headrick
The American University in Cairo
Maadi, Cairo, Egypt
contact@savvy-women-magazine.com






It’s the first Thursday in September, and that means I’ve been back in Cairo for exactly a week now.  That’s long enough for me to have developed a touch of homesickness.

I miss my family.  I miss Tex-Mex food.  I miss being in familiar places.  I miss being surrounded by people who speak a language I can fully understand.  I even miss TV, especially my favorite, summertime program, Big Brother, which I usually watch (quite obsessively, I might add) with my mother and grandmother. We have fun discussing the various houseguests, trashing those we hate, praising those we love, and making predictions about what’s going to happen next, who’s in jeopardy and who’s playing the game exceptionally well, stuff like that.

faces Big Sister 11

It’s Thursday, and that means the show is going to be televised this evening.  Someone is going to be voted out of the house today.  Once that happens, there’ll be only four houseguests left.

There’s unanimous feeling, on the blogs I read on a daily basis (see this one and this one), that Jeff is going to be evicted this evening.  Once that happens, three of the four remaining houseguests will be women.  Kevin will be the only man left.  That means there’s a seventy-five percent chance that a woman will win the $500,000 this year.

In my opinion, this scenario, where most of the surviving competitors happen to be females, validates Deborah Tannen’s theories about the communication styles of men and women.  Tannen, arguably the preeminent expert on this subject, feels that men are generally less inclined to be verbal and to use interpersonal communication as a tool to establish relationships.  Instead, they use it to project their own power in whatever social situation they happen to find themselves.  Women, on the other hand, use language to bond.  They use language to establish intimacy, not pecking order.

Of the men, Ronnie, Jessie, and Russell were the most “male” or “masculine,” as defined by Tannen, in their way of using language.  As a result, they came across as quite untrustworthy and were always subjects of suspicion.  These three prided themselves on being deceptive and were frequently engaged in verbal confrontations.  Communication, for them, was a tool used to bludgeon or manipulate the other players.

Jeff, I would say, was somewhat androgynous in his style of communicating, and Kevin, who openly stated that he was gay, was the most “female” of all the men in the way he verbally interacted with those around him.  As a matter of fact, Kevin appeared to spend most of his time, from the earliest episodes onward, huddled up with those of the opposite sex.

Big Brother seems to be the sort of game that favors those, of either gender, who can use language in a “female” way to establish the greatest number of loyal allies.

With that in mind, I’ll make my prediction about this year’s outcome:  Michele will win Big Brother 11.  She seems to understand the power that language plays in the game, and she is very talented in making those around her feel as if they are seeing the real Michele.  Honestly, though, I wouldn’t be surprised if Kevin ended up taking home the money.

The person least likely to win is Natalie.  Her way of using language is the most “male” of those left.

Let’s see how it ends up.